LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. Tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. THE RANCH GOLF CLUB, PURE STORAGE, INC. V. MENLO LAND & CAPITAL II, LLC, MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. CASE NO. 22 I. 5 The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. 2001) 261 F.3d 912, . SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), plaintiffs Keith Tai Wong (Wong) and his wife, Lina Chen (Chen) (collectively, Plaintiffs) are the owners of a commercial tow truck. 23 I. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. These are two separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the same event. Please wait a moment while we load this page. 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Case no. Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint Probate Tentative Rulings. 23 This is a putative class action. 13 MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. Proc. ROE 1, ET AL. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; and JOHN HOWLAND, an individual, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE 14 Plaintiffs, TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEFENDANTS 15 vs. MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS Factual and Procedural Background The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: I. try clicking the minimize button instead. of its intention to appear. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. Superior Court (1986) . The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. You can always see your envelopes 26 This is a putative class action. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. LTD V. VASILY TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL, DAVID BAEZ ET AL VS CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD. RAMIREZ, ET AL. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Plaintiff Institute for Business & Technology, Inc. (Plaintiff) alleges that it has been a tenant at a commercial property located at 2400 Walsh Avenue in Santa Clara, California since 2003. Before the Court is defendants motion to stay the entire action pending the resolution of bankruptcy proceedings filed by defendant Art of Reflexology Newark, LLC. 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA CAL. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. JILL STEARNS V. GULESSERIAN BROS., INC., ET AL. For information about getting help through the Self Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. I. This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Background 50, inclusive, Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC. INTRODUCTION Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling 9 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 8 If you were scheduled for a court appearance during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and your hearing did not take place, please continue to check this system for updates on your new court appearance date. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court, and no hearing is held, unless one of the parties contests the tentative ruling by complying with California Rules of Court 3.1308 and Local Rule 2.10. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 23 I. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. This is a class action under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act). V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. MARKO VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L. DAWSON, ET AL. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA (Id.) SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY OF PALO ALTO, ET AL. 12 individually and in his official capacity; try clicking the minimize button instead. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. GEOFFREY WEIGAND V. SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL. 3 Tentative Rulings. TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. Plaintiff Helen Givens (Plaintiff) brings this action against her former husband, Roy Givens (Husband) and several other defendants for damages associated with domestic violence and financial abuse. Court CMP calendars in Departments 31 and 38 may access the Case Names: Mark Gomez, et al. I. vs. determine whether or not an appearance is required. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will 13 VENCLOSE INC., a Delaware Corporation, 14 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC 15 vs. VICE; DEMURRER TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 COVIDIEN LP, COVIDIEN HOLDING INC., DISCOVERY RESPONSES 15 If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. The tentative ruling shall become All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. YOU MUST CALL (650) 261-5102 BEFORE 4:00 P.M. WITH THE CASE NAME, NUMBER, AND THE NAME OF THE PARTY CONTESTING. Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (together, 27 Plaintiffs) allege various Labor . public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department Plaintiff Jason Flickinger brings this Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Physician Michael Black sued Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN) for defamation after it ran a story about high mortality rates for infants and children undergoing open heart surgery in the Pe Medical Center The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 50, inclusive, This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. Background and Discovery Dispute State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. Background Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. LAGOS V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. Courtroom 12Hall of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa(707) 521-6724. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. I. For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage. BRIAN CROOK, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. DAVID MAAS, BARRY NG, ANITA PHAGAN, & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT. Any motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the . Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). inclusive, Factual Background 2. 14 BENEFICIARY OF DECEASED CITY MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. 22 I. will be able to access it on trellis. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court Before the Court is the Motion of Plaintiff David L. Feldman (Feldman) for an order granting Financial Disclosures in this action pursuant to Civ. 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND I. FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. STEPHEN KUBIAK, ET AL. Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; 16 A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? 6. A.) BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. V. ZHEN ZHEN LI, ET AL. 24 I. 38). 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. If neither party appears at the scheduled hearing, the tentative ruling may become the final order of the court on the date set for the hearing. V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. 23 I. 3 Gloria Estillore (Plaintiff) brings this action against Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., U.S. Bank N.A., as trustee on behalf of the holders of J.P. Morgan Alternative Loan Trust 2007-A2 mortgage pass through certificates, and Peter Carey (Defendants) for damages associated with wrongful foreclosure. 23 This is a putative class action. Defendants Jaim Nulman (Nulman) and Yali Pharmaceutical, Ltd. (Yali) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the complaint (Complaint) filed by plaintiff Avelyn Welczer (Plaintiff). public access site. County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Last. Association, Inc., et al. You can always see your envelopes Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. 4. We're sorry your court map could not be found. TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. Please wait a moment while we load this page. V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Court's When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. 6 Background ROBERT DURHAM V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL. Check Jury Reporting Status. 7 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA This action arises from a scam that uses images and videos of plaintiff Steve Wozniak and other famous tech entrepreneurs to fraudulently induce individuals to transfer their cryptocurrency to the scammers. Factual and Procedural Background -2 If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. IN RE QUANTUM CORP. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge. ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. 19 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 20 on June 9, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3. Probate Tentative Rulings. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Motion to compel granted. All noticed motions and demurrers shall include Footnote 17: Defendants. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. JENNIFER RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL. the opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing, no hearing Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . Plaintiffs, Public Access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area code; and. ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. FRATELLI RANCH, LLC, ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. This is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 Factual and Procedural Background S266254, 2022 WL 3096272, . Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 You are using an outdated browser. TRISTA THOMAS V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. 5133 13 directory, between the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on the court day before V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. The court has read and considered the authorities and argument of counsel set forth in the motion to lift stay of discovery, opposition and reply, and makes the following tentative ruling: 12 KERRY WILLIAM SCRIBNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 14 vs. V. COOK GROUP, INC., ET AL. [email protected] ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. Case no. JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. 15 vs. Sacramento Superior Court I. ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courts, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. BACKGROUND All parties appearing on the Law and Motion Defendants motion followed Newarks -4 If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). 11 22 I. 8 (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) On February 5, 2016, plaintiff Monique M. Davilla (Davilla), individually and on behalf of A.E.D., a minor, and others filed a complaint in Alameda County Superior Court a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted Filter by a specific county without spaces. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, or who appear without notice to both the Court and opposing counsel, will not be heard. Civil Case Management Calendar ext. FOR STAY 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. Filter by a specific county without spaces. VOLZ, ET AL. ; Angela Jasso v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO. JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). 6 asks the responding party to: IDENTIFY all payments m MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 10 SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to . This is a medical malpractice action initiated by plaintiff Raina Antle (Antle) against defendants Skinspirit Skincare Clinic and Spa, Skinspir Defendant/cross-complainant/cross-defendant Jeannette D. Kennedy, as Trustee of the Jeannette D. Kennedy Trust Dated April 14, 2004 (Defendant or Kennedy) moves for summary judgment in her favor and against plaintiff Nicholas Herriot (Plaintiff) as to the claims asserted by him in the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC).
Ralph Lane Life December 1931 Answer Key,
Paul Coronation Street Nose,
Is Neena Pacholke Married,
Hotel Julien Dubuque Haunted,
Articles S
